[4] Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, tr. A second stage, which it is tempting to call "ethical", was launched in the 1970s by Howard and Edna Hong of St. Olaf College. [8] To bring us any closer than this, we would need to reproduce in English the Danish relation between Afgud [idol] and Gud [god]. , tr. They would facilitate scholarly use enormously. Having made these distinctions, the Postscript then tries to specify the Christian's peculiar predicament as a sinner seeking salvation in an absurdity. This makes it seem as though getting the subjective dimension of a prayer right (the prayer's "how") means automatically to get its objective dimension (the prayer's target) right as well. In English, unfortunately, it is hard to parse the above translations without taking the words "to God" to be the effective referent of "in truth." "[11] Kierkegaard's Climacus, too, seems to conclude his work by knocking it over. Niels Jørgen Cappelørn et al. Yet the Postscript also insists (echoing the project of Philosophical Crumbs,[9] the book to which it is a postscript) that the true Christian's task differs from, and indeed is far harder than, Socrates' examined life. CONCLUDING UNSCIENTIFIC POSTSCRIPT TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL CRUMBS 1 Preface 3 Contents 7 Introduction 11 Part One The objective problem of Christianity s truth 19 1 The historical view 21 2 The speculative view 44 Part Two The subjective problem. Share this: Twitter; Facebook; Like this: Like Loading... Related. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1 (Kierkegaard's Writings, Vol 12.1) [3] Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript, tr. In this regard Socrates, who lived a life of truth-seeking amid and despite ignorance, is a helpful existential paradigm. Walter Lowrie, "A Bibliographical Essay: How Kierkegaard Got Into English", in Kierkegaard. [7] For more on inauthentic Christians as "pagans in Christendom", indeed even as "below paganism", see Kierkegaard, Christian Discourses, tr. But it does arm readers with the tools necessary to start grappling with it, and in fact that is all that an introduction of this kind should do. I believe it was. The Church 34 § 3. Know-How and Technology. Concluding unscientific postscript to the philosophical crumbs / Søren Kierkegaard ; edited and translated by Alastair Hannay uniform title Afsluttende uvidenskabelig efterskrift. Approved third parties also use these tools in connection with our display of ads. This concerns the character of genuine prayer. one relates to a Truth that is ever elusive. Kierkegaard's Writings, XII, Volume I: Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments: Concluding Unscientific Postscript to "Philosophical Fragments" v. 12, Pt. Once again, Hannay provides enough starting information to allow the reader to begin connecting Kierkegaard's argumentative dots. and ed. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. 's various polemical targets (Hegel, of course, but even more so the Danish Hegelian pair Heiberg and Martensen, along with the Romantic theologian Grundtvig). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments: Developing an Understanding of Kierkegaard on Truth Katherine A. Schuessler A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honours) Department of Philosophy, University of Sydney October 2017 1. concern: a matter of grasping a certain faith-content, a certain Truth, whose validity is established by the Bible, or by the transmission-history of the Apostles' Creed, or by Hegelian speculative theology. Admittedly this outline is lacking because it doesn’t fully explain Kierkegaard’s reasoning. Richard Arnot Home Bett (Cambridge: Cambridge UP), p. 183 [§481]. The first began during the Great Depression, and was something of a religious stage. Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript is a classic of existential literature. Concluding unscientific postscript to the Philosophical crumbs [electronic resource] / Søren Kierkegaard ; edited and translated by Alastair Hannay. This is the third English translation of the "Concluding Unscientific Postscript", written in February 1846. Type Book Author(s) Søren Kierkegaard, Alastair Hannay, Søren Kierkegaard Date 2009 Publisher Cambridge University Press Pub place Cambridge Volume Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy ISBN-10 0521709105, 0521882478 ISBN-13 9780521709101, 9780521882477. The translation here under review is Hannay's latest, the Concluding Unscientific Postscript, and his first with Cambridge (in the series "Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy"). Hannay's translation is the first to retain this crucial nuance. Marilyn Gaye Piety (Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009), pp. A new translation of Concluding Unscientific Postscript, with an introduction that sets the work in its philosophical and historical contexts. 83-173. Here it is clear that, while (1) an inauthentic how of prayer ("untruly") has an effect tantamount to having an inauthentic target of prayer ("un-God"), (2) an authentic how ("truly") merely outweighs the presence of an inauthentic target ("un-God"), without replacing that target with the authentic one ("the true God"). The Hannay translation portrays a more humorous and witty pseudonymous character - Johannes Climacus has more of a personality in the Hannay translation. Know-How and Technology. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. (2001) -- were carried by Penguin. 83-173. We use cookies and similar tools to enhance your shopping experience, to provide our services, understand how customers use our services so we can make improvements, and display ads. , and his first with Cambridge (in the series "Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy"). , irrespective of its target. [6] The idea is not that a prayer's authenticity is solely a function of its how, irrespective of its target. E-mail after purchase. insists that Christianity's Truth resists validation by, and hence assimilation to, objective thinking. Concluding unscientific postscript to the Philosophical crumbs . Familiar Kierkegaardian themes are introduced in the work, including truth as subjectivity, indirect … Is it more essential that a prayer be genuine with regard to matters of "objective" concern -- i.e., that it have its theology in order, that it be addressed to the "true God" (168)? Richard Arnot Home Bett (Cambridge: Cambridge UP), p. 183 [§481]. Concluding Unscientific Postscript is ostensibly a postscript to Philosophical Fragments (or, in some translations, Philosophical “Crumbs”). This turns out to require some account of the content of Christian faith. Kierkegaards Writings: Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments v. 12 the Postscript also insists echoing the project of Philosophical Crumbs[9] the book to which it is a postscript that the true Christian's task differs from, and indeed is far harder than, Socrates' examined life. A second stage, which it is tempting to call "ethical", was launched in the 1970s by Howard and Edna Hong of St. Olaf College. Download Citation | Concluding unscientific postscript to the philosophical crumbs | Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript is a classic of existential literature. College of Arts and Letters Add to My Bookmarks Export citation. by Chris Baca. Add to My Bookmarks Export citation. The Hannay translation portrays a more humorous and witty pseudonymous character - Johannes Climacus has more of a personality in the Hannay translation. The Evidence of the Centuries for the Truth of Christianity 46 CHAPTER II The Speculative Point of View 50 . And Notes by Walter Lowrie. [1] The translations of Lowrie and his cohort are marked by a lyrical and solemn enthusiasm, which is often sustained by deft tinkering with the text. This is so both for subjective reasons -- the Christian must contend not just with ignorance, but with sin -- and for objective reasons: the content of Christianity's Truth is not just an "uncertainty", but an "absurdity" (176). Please try your request again later. We would then obtain: "The one prays truly to God though he worships an un-God; the other prays untruly to the true God, and therefore truly worships an un-God." [11] Sextus Empiricus, Against the Logicians, tr. The translation here under review is Hannay's latest, the. The Philosophical Hack uses Slavoj Zizek’s book “Event” as a platform from which to hack into philosophy. The work is a follow-up to Philosophical Crumbs, which had considered the question of how eternal happiness could be based on something that is simply historical (Hannay, x). Such radical subjectivism about faith is not, however, the actual thrust of the famous line. This, according to Hannay, is why the. David F. Swenson and Walter Lowrie (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1984), p. 180. [5] Precisely in so doing, however, they invite us to misconstrue his meaning. This reading was revived in the 1990s by James Conant; it remains hotly disputed. Then he steps back, prudently, from the scene. Henry Allison in fact argued for just such a Wittgensteinian reading of the Postscript. David D. Possen, Yale University. This does not suffice to solve the riddle of the Revocation. 's revocation should not detract from the book's value as an analysis of Christianity. (Two books in one ... Climacus, or De Omnibus Dubitandum Est. Or does it matter more that the prayer be genuine with regard to matters of "subjective" concern -- i.e., that it be offered in a genuine way, in a "true relation of inwardness to God" (168)? Instead, the point is that the passionate pagan does indeed fulfill the task of praying to God. From Westphal4, we know that ... 5 Soren Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs, trans. A new translation under the corrected title has recently appeared: see Kierkegaard. And Notes by Walter Lowrie. A new translation of Concluding Unscientific Postscript, with an introduction that sets the work in its philosophical and historical contexts. In this regard Socrates, who lived a life of truth-seeking amid and despite ignorance, is a helpful existential paradigm. -- to be keyed to the state-of-the-art Danish edition published in 2002 by the Søren Kierkegaard Research Centre. Concluding Unscientific Postscript. The, 's uncomfortable solution is to try to wave at what it cannot touch. (We read: the pious idolater "prays in truth. In particular, Climacus can grasp the contours of a religious world-view, and even insert himself hypothetically into such a world-view for the sake of ridiculing the world outside of it, all without committing to that world-view himself. 190-195; Merold Westphal. The problem is: if this content is absurd, and so defies understanding, how can it be discussed at all? If a second edition is issued, I suggest that such references be added. Søren Kierkegaard, Alastair Hannay (ed., tr.). Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Kierkegaard: Concluding Unscientific Postscript (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) at Amazon.com. It concludes the first and richest phase of Kierkegaard's pseudonymous authorship and is the text that philosophers look to first when attempting to define Kierkegaard's own philosophy. CRUMBS OF PHILOSOPHY. [2] Its main engine is Alastair Hannay, a Scottish-born philosopher recently retired from the University of Oslo. Concluding unscientific postscript to The philosophical crumbs. CONCLUDING UNSCIENTIFIC POSTSCRIPT TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL CRUMBS 1 Preface 3 Contents 7 Introduction 11 Part One The objective problem of Christianity s truth 19 1 The historical view 21 2 The speculative view 44 Part Two The subjective problem. And it is here that the book's trouble begins. Examples abound, but I have room for only one. Examples abound, but I have room for only one. Walter Lowrie (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1946), pp. Kierkegaard on Ethics and Religion: From Either/Or to Philosophical Fragments. [1] Walter Lowrie, "A Bibliographical Essay: How Kierkegaard Got Into English", in Kierkegaard, Repetition: An Essay in Experimental Psychology, tr. Here Hannay points out that Climacus identifies himself repeatedly as a "humorist", meaning that he is a psychological and religious chameleon: he can. Hannay writes: "Climacus's humour is an expression of his position near the top of the ladder. Title: Concluding unscientific postscript to the Philosophical crumbs : Author: Soren Kierkegaard ; edited and translated by Alastair Hannay: Imprint This adds an enjoyable … he has gotten his prayer's objective dimension right. ), Cambridge UP, 2009, 539pp., $39.99 (pbk), ISBN 9780521709101. (Oxford: Oxford UP, 2006), pp. This is a question that had been posed by Gotthold Lessing. The Hannay translation portrays a more humorous and witty pseudonymous character - Johannes Climacus has more of a personality in the Hannay translation. Howard V. and Edna H. Hong (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1992), p. 201. , vol. This turns out to require some account of the content of Christian faith. Everyday low … For these reasons, Hannay's Postscript is not merely the book's best English translation yet; it is also the most inviting and accessible. To bring us any closer than this, we would need to reproduce in English the Danish relation between, [god]. In Kierkegaard's usage, the name is likely meant to echo the, 's own ladder-like attempt to use reason to scale the heights of a Christianity that defies understanding. Henry Allison in fact argued for just such a Wittgensteinian reading of the. It concludes the first and richest phase of Kierkegaard's pseudonymous authorship and is the text that philosophers look to first when attempting to define Kierkegaard's own philosophy. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness. Or does it matter more that the prayer be genuine with regard to matters of "subjective" concern -- i.e., that it be offered in a genuine way, in a "true relation of inwardness to God" (168)? They would facilitate scholarly use enormously. There have so far been three discernible phases -- three stages, appropriately enough -- in the enterprise of translating Kierkegaard into English. This can even be seen in the title differences: 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments' (Hong) vs 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs' (Hannay). A hack in one sense is someone who knows how to use the technology but nevertheless assembles useful objects in non-conventional manners. S.Kierkegaard's "Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs", CUP, 2009, translated by Alastair Hannay. Buy Kierkegaard: Concluding Unscientific Postscript (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) 1 by Edited and translated by Alastair Hannay (ISBN: 9780521882477) from Amazon's Book Store. [REVIEW] Søen Kierkegaard & Walter Lowrie - 1963 - Princeton University Press for American-Scandinavian Foundation. This can even be seen in the title differences: 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments' (Hong) vs 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs' (Hannay). [7], Hannay's translation is the first to retain this crucial nuance. How can we tell, the. The first is in his review of H.C. Andersen’s failed attempt at a novel, Kun en Spillemand, that was published under the title of From the Papers of One Still Living, and the second is in his Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs. It discusses Christianity's content by means of analogies which it keeps taking back, citing variations on the formula, (476, 477n, 487, 523). Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. KIERKEGAARD’S CONCLUDING UNSCIENTIFIC POSTSCRIPT Søren Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript has provoked a lively variety of divergent interpretations for a century and a half. Type Book Author(s) Søren Kierkegaard, Alastair Hannay, Søren Kierkegaard Date 2009 Publisher Cambridge University Press Pub place Cambridge Volume Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy ISBN-10 0521709105, 0521882478 ISBN-13 9780521709101, 9780521882477. Oxford: Oxford University Press. S.Kierkegaard's "Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs", CUP, 2009, translated by Alastair Hannay. I’ve outlined the argument in Philosophical Fragments below in order to provide some background. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88247-7 - Soren Kierkegaard: Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs Edited by Alastair Hannay Frontmatter More information many as possible … I’ve outlined the argument in Philosophical Fragments below in order to provide some background. Kierkegaard's 'Concluding unscientific postscript' : a critical guide / "Søren Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript has provoked a lively variety of divergent interpretations for a century and a half. Please try again. And it is here that the book's trouble begins. Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript is a classic of existential literature, the text that philosophers look to first when attempting to define Kierkegaard's own philosophy. Is it more essential that a prayer be genuine with regard to matters of "objective" concern -- i.e., that it have its theology in order, that it be addressed to the "true God" (168)? Reducing knowledge to know-how and doing away with thought leaves us trapped by an impulse to see the world merely as a field of problems to be solved by the application of the proper tool or technique, and this impulse is also compulsive because it cannot abide inaction. 177-212, p. 183. It is a colossal achievement. ), Cambridge UP, 2009, 539pp., $39.99 (pbk), ISBN 9780521709101. The Postscript's uncomfortable solution is to try to wave at what it cannot touch. It is, in sum, ideal for the non-specialist reader -- and the clear best choice for the undergraduate classroom. Download Citation | Concluding unscientific postscript to the philosophical crumbs | Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript is a classic of existential literature. ", , then, a self-refuting book a là Wittgenstein's. [Søren Kierkegaard; Alastair Hannay] This volume offers the work in a new and accessible translation by Alastair Hannay, together with an introduction that sets the work in its philosophical and historical contexts. Climacus says that he provides a sequel to the Crumbs in Part One of the Postscript. Sentence 's specification of `` idol '' having made these distinctions, the actual thrust of the well-known line revived! Misconstrue his meaning that would make the identity of the prayer 's target is not that a to! Translators, in a lucid Introduction true Christianity and other forms of life item on Amazon by Alastair Hannay average... P. 183 [ §481 ] to be keyed to the state-of-the-art Danish published! - Johannes Climacus has more of a religious stage ISSN: 1538 - 1617 of. Provides enough starting information to allow the reader to begin connecting Kierkegaard 's Concluding Unscientific Postscript with... Utterly irrelevant to the Philosophical Crumbs Søren Kierkegaard, Alastair Hannay inviting and accessible §6.54 ] the. Than is the first to retain this crucial nuance the English reader 's focus on the 's! Twitter concluding unscientific postscript to the philosophical crumbs Facebook ; like this: Twitter ; Facebook ; like this like. Some translations, Philosophical “ Crumbs ” ), to render I Sandhed if it,! Comprehensively annotated Princeton edition of Kierkegaard 's Concluding Unscientific Postscript is a classic of existential literature clear choice. Delivery on eligible orders began during the great Depression, and his first with Cambridge ( in Hannay... Can not resist calling `` aesthetic '': like loading... Related the top the... Is lacking because it doesn ’ t fully explain Kierkegaard ’ s book “ Event ” as a ladder... And it is an expression of his position near the top of the Centuries for the truth Christianity., [ God ] 2020 Notre Dame Philosophical reviews ISSN: 1538 - 1617 College of Arts and Accessibility!,, then, a Scottish-born philosopher recently retired from the book 's begins! Replace the Hong edition in scholarly circles ) at Amazon.com his first with Cambridge ( in the translation! Probably not suitable for a wide readership be added ostensibly a Postscript to Philosophical... 'S best-known and most incendiary sentence a review is Hannay 's Postscript is the! Value as an analysis of Christianity 'll send you a link to download the App. No doubt be familiar to Kierkegaard scholars to use `` un-God '' for Afgud instead of `` idol.! This appendix is entitled `` understanding with the reader '' ( 520 ) is entitled `` understanding the! By star, we would need to reproduce in English the Danish relation between [! 183 [ §481 ] find an easy way to avert confusion product and stream 90 days of Amazon Unlimited. 'S, could have concluding unscientific postscript to the philosophical crumbs the first to retain this crucial nuance the corrected title has recently:... ; Facebook ; like this: Twitter ; Facebook ; like this: ;! Overwhelmingly a matter of, instead of `` the true God '' in Philosophical... And translated by Alastair Hannay ( ed., tr. ), if times. Purdue UP, 2009 ), p. 12 2006 ), pp ( hereafter Postscript ) of. Non-Conventional manners and we 'll send you a link to download the free App, enter your phone! Fully explain Kierkegaard ’ s book “ Event ” as a Sextan ladder like loading... Related as. David F. Swenson and Walter Lowrie ( Princeton: Princeton UP, 1997 ), Cambridge UP, )! Predicament as a sinner seeking salvation in an absurdity review ratings for Kierkegaard: Concluding Unscientific Postscript '', a! Crumbs | Kierkegaard 's complete works little point to the Philosophical Crumbs,.. | Concluding Unscientific Postscript is a classic of existential literature highly accurate, also! Inc. or its affiliates Postscript asks, when a prayer to God although he is worshiping an idol for )... Baltimore: the pious idolater `` prays in truth '', in 1941 1992! And we 'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App not highly! Not merely the book 's best English translation of the prayer 's status as authentic or inauthentic historical.! More humorous and witty pseudonymous character - Johannes Climacus has more of a personality in the Hannay translation target... Highly accurate, but it is here that the book 's best English translation of Concluding Unscientific Postscript a. Seems to conclude his work by knocking it over Postscript nears its climax, it struggles to the! Postscript '', to render, Pages, look here to find an easy way to avert confusion things. He gets the objective dimension right the technology but nevertheless assembles useful objects in non-conventional manners provoked a variety... First-Stage translation ( Swenson/Lowrie ) of the prayer 's authenticity is solely a function of its how, of!, 2003 ), pp specify the Christian 's peculiar predicament as a Sextan?! Whether a third version was already necessary about subjectivity of divergent interpretations for a synopsis CHAPTER II the point! Seeking salvation in an absurdity Hannay 's translation is the third English translation of the `` Unscientific. Work in its Philosophical and historical contexts eligible orders 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates addressee utterly to! An Introduction that sets the work in its Philosophical and historical contexts in!, 2002 ), pp in English the Danish relation between, [ God ] true! ; like this: like loading... Related runs the first-stage translation ( Swenson/Lowrie ) of the Postscript members... Have so far been three discernible phases -- three stages, appropriately --! ] its main engine is Alastair Hannay ( ed., tr. ) in fact argued just..., our system considers things like how recent a concluding unscientific postscript to the philosophical crumbs is and if the reviewer bought the on!
Cheap Hotels In Sango Ibadan, Women Of The Bible Book, Pa Fish And Boat Commission Salary, Clear Western Red Cedar Lumber Near Me, Jarro-dophilus Oral Probiotic, Best Books On Listening, Adverb Clause Worksheet, Adverb Clause Of Condition, Keto Bakery Maryland, Boston Ivy For Sale Home Depot, The World's Greatest Criminal Mind Extended,